The Wuhan Institute of Virology is located in the city where the pandemic began. (Photo by Hector Retamal, AFP/Getty) |
The department "made its judgment with 'low confidence,' according to people who have read the classified report," the Journal reports. The agency thus joins the FBI "in saying the virus likely spread via a mishap at a Chinese laboratory," the Journal notes. "The FBI previously came to the conclusion that the pandemic was likely the result of a lab leak in 2021 with 'moderate confidence' and still holds to this view. . . . While the Energy Department and the FBI each say an unintended lab leak is most likely, they arrived at those conclusions for different reasons."
Four other agencies and a national intelligence panel still judge with "low confidence" that the pandemic "was likely the result of a natural transmission, and two are undecided," the Journal reports. "The Energy Department’s conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S. national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research."
The Journal adds, "The National Intelligence Council, which conducts long-term strategic analysis, and four agencies, which officials declined to identify, still assess with 'low confidence' that the virus came about through natural transmission from an infected animal, according to the updated report. The Central Intelligence Agency and another agency that officials wouldn’t name remain undecided between the lab-leak and natural-transmission theories . . . Despite the agencies’ differing analyses, the update reaffirmed an existing consensus between them that Covid-19 wasn’t the result of a Chinese biological-weapons program, the people who have read the classified report said."
The Journal adds, "The National Intelligence Council, which conducts long-term strategic analysis, and four agencies, which officials declined to identify, still assess with 'low confidence' that the virus came about through natural transmission from an infected animal, according to the updated report. The Central Intelligence Agency and another agency that officials wouldn’t name remain undecided between the lab-leak and natural-transmission theories . . . Despite the agencies’ differing analyses, the update reaffirmed an existing consensus between them that Covid-19 wasn’t the result of a Chinese biological-weapons program, the people who have read the classified report said."
Because no animal source for the novel coronavirus has been confiormed, and Wuhan, where the outbreak began, "is the center of China’s extensive coronavirus research, has led some scientists and U.S. officials to argue that a lab leak is the best explanation for the pandemic’s beginning," the Journal reports. "State Department cables written in 2018 and internal Chinese documents show that there were persistent concerns about China’s biosafety procedures, which have been cited by proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis."
from KENTUCKY HEALTH NEWS https://ift.tt/AH0G5Vu With 'low confidence,' Energy Dept. says Covid-19 likely spread from a lab; FBI agrees; 4 other agencies and intel panel do not Healthy Care
0 Response to "With 'low confidence,' Energy Dept. says Covid-19 likely spread from a lab; FBI agrees; 4 other agencies and intel panel do not Healthy Care"
Post a Comment